The cellphone user and the sky rise

People have always been building things for peoples’ needs. Presumably the first fork did not fit everyone’s hand and multiple forks were made before today’s common fork was formed, its form, its material, and its life span. Product developers know that some things become unusable for reasons better left unpublicized and products receive a lifespan. Old things can be slippery, not in tune to dining culture, or dangerous to use.

The first computers required a lifelong career in government to be useable. The first personal computers required a Silicon Valley type home with your body and use measured for computing. Now all homes are capable of containing a Silicon family house.

Cellphones were designed with telecom data use habits in mind, often found in office call centers, the fire department, police station, or government agencies. The salesman had to employ the customer in telecom over time in order to sell them a home phone, broadcaster, receiver, and plant in one handheld package.

Like the fork, the cellphone expires and no longer feels as useable in its user’s hand. Like the fork, the cellphone was not first designed for all people. New cellphones work for most people who invested in personal computers and the internet, but they don’t work for anyone else without guidance or instruction.

Today, with UCLA building a nanotechnology research lab to develop lower power use utilities, we have a chance to reinvent the wheel. Computers, cellphones, books, and anything electronic, requiring power, or having a physical appearance can be redesigned for those who never invested in technology before, or who did not have the buying power before Tesla and Edison.

UCLA Win-Gem Nanotechnology Lab

 

Residential home architects are developing a new type of house and a new type of remodel process involving teaching users how to move around and observe space differently. This can be categorized under modular homes or apartments, prefabricated, sustainable, or anything else with the development curve of the new cellphone.

Equinox, one of almost all gyms to begin implementing new mechanical physics for new technology

 

While everyone gets a new phone, we have a new density of information we can present in a cellphone picture, we have new norms for human appearance and new signage for new normal people.

This whole process in a sense turns the cellphone buyer into a conscious designer of their space. With the cellphone market working so steeply to keep its novelty factor, we technically have cellphone buyers ordering cellphones that in actuality build alternate hospitals or sky rise hotels. We are getting close to  being able to pay product users for their work.

Ultimately, we are looking to increase this curve to develop live materials. Live drywall, live steel, and live concrete that saves you money at the gas station, and optimistically can move walls around with the click of a mouse, replace a computer screen due to advances in optics and conductivity and by being paid and cared for similarly to silicon inside your ventilated computer case or cellphone.

Another dream proposal is a space where we interact with our cellphones in a public environment: seeing a map of a shopping mall on an arbitrary piece of drywall as we enter, sharing meaningful data with others on a window in a cafeteria, and even having virtual spaces ordered for us to fill in empty rooms.

This magic has worked in the labs, I am witness. My question is, is there a better use for this investment, can we put this on hold while we build a better multinational hospital, school, workplace, or park? Something to cure old disease, find resolutions to war, create better food, lead to a better society? Or to give the user complete control over the development cycle? Should any of this have been electrical or steel in the first place?

Beko Master Plan by Zaha Hadid Architects, Kosta Toskovic, and others

 

BIM bridging sectors: a need for new forms of construction documentation

Building information modeling provides us with intelligence at a new tempo and the opportunity to instantly generate altered documentation for all sectors in the architecture, engineering and construction industry including construction management, asset management, risk assessment, finance, real estate acquisition, permitting, installation, and design. We can generate architectural and engineer drawings color matched with installation preparedness documentation, construction schedules, quantity and cost lists, results from databases of engineering equipment and design submittals and proven means and methods for installation*,  charts and graphs representing project cost, schedule, and value performance prepared for clients, financers, and other stakeholders, and a live building information model displaying project progress and design development. Sustainability charts and value engineered percentage of improvement graphs can be generated instantly and communicated to all parties. Color and different symbolic links between documents would allow parties across professions to analyze real construction data simultaneously as soon as decisions are made or options are considered. Installers, financers, designers, general contractors, and even clients would gain a voice among all sectors. The risk of project delays is severely negated by often instantaneous construction installation documentation generated from workflow and scheduling driven by these and other integrated design and documentation practices. You have design equally pushed from all sectors, visually documented and communicated. You also have a mass of new intelligence informing the design. The installers can inform the architectural and engineering designers, the bankers can inform the general contractors, and the architectural and engineering designers can inform the financers and clients with live numbers. Conversations about LEED and value engineering, solar subsidies and high tech investment can be quantified weekly if not daily with cogent documents.

*Some contract firms assign installers and managers to document means and methods proved during the construction phase of a project using digital software or pen and paper. These records are processed at a CAD/BIM department, then stamped and signed off by the installers, and catalogued in a database for future reference. On future projects, lists of details and means and methods can be retrieved and confirmed and insured by the sign off party and other responsible parties as useable, or rejected and applied as continued expansion of research and development. Eventually, published documentation of means and methods catalogue the contractor firm’s research and development, engineering unknowns. These are shared with engineering firms, schools and certain discipline related agencies, and treated as and processed into catalogues of engineering statistics or proposals for engineering research.

Resolving green building, good architecture and long lasting city planning

For the last 100 years, power has been associated with luxury. The more powerful your air conditioning system at home, the more lighting and flexibility in lighting and the more plugs you have for all of your devices, the higher the value of your house. In essence, the power bill reflects how hospitable your house is and how hospitable or luxurious you perceive public venues and hotels and restaurants. You should feel threatened by LED lights used in moderation, weakened air conditioning systems, and lower gallon per minute shower heads, which all lower energy costs.  With all of these issues resolved with equal effective lighting levels, equal effective air temperature and quality control, and equal plumbing capacity, something feels less valuable when we are used to impressive ice cold malls littered with LCD screens and their grounds covered in blooming fountains. For these reasons, we look back to before electricity became common place and are seeing what indicated luxury then: ultimately, similar to now, contemporary connections to enriching culture, well thought out symbols as extreme as the obelisk in front of the Pantheon at its time and at its place or a California Craftsman home today, as a vote of loyalty to a good format for living.

Green building also represents a change for the air conditioning, electrical, and plumbing industries. The income from sold equipment goes down, the value of design work goes up, but only for a time during this transition phase. What do we do tomorrow to preserve these industries? Can we invest more in engineering design, respecting the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing in buildings as much as the inhabited and physically observed space and continue to think of their synthesis, where they come together, where their design intention overlaps, where engineering inspires architecture, and scenarios where the right air conditioning can be more interesting than its enclosure. Is it a culturally significant decision to begin contrasting the Roman aquaducts, the Los Angeles aquaduct, and what feeds this sink or that toilet, to the architects’ form follows function of visual culture thesis? Can our modern physics and chemistry explain to us the difference between one culture’s plumbing and another culture’s plumbing? Can we begin investing in better electricity, better air conditioning, and better plumbing, both in terms of novel paradigms in science and novel paradigms in design?

While one may feel the effect of the building is cheapened with lower power, lower air conditioning, less flexibility with used electrical equipment, if design is constrained by the traditional roster for good buildings, all is well. Today, green building is a part of culturally significant conversations, but this conversation should be a very contemporary one. If the roster seeks to find the line where green building inspired design and contemporary design standards not only overlap, but reinforce and magnify each other, we have a score. At this point, translation and bridges become easy, and what was before LEED becomes common place, accessible, and ingrained in our culture. We are still asking ourselves the same questions: are LEED platinum buildings the future, are they necessary, how much of our green building inspired designs are advertising and how long will they last, and how do we build more thoroughly intended long lasting cities, with green building standards accounted for as rationally as possible. 

Fragmented cultures and sciences: the future of our place in corporate, international, etc. stages

Form per our fragmented cultures can follow the function of materials proved to work through our fragmented physics and building sciences. We rely highly on statistics in building sciences. In interpreting culture and evolution of culture, we have little to no consensus.

If form follows the function of the users’ eyes, this is being shaped by evolving, generated, and uncovered cultures each day, both per our arts, sciences, and social sciences and our tools, technologically modern and whatever else may go in, on or roughly near our buildings. This is something a user may assume from the perspective of belonging to a collective, perceive collectively and perceive individually. This should be acknowledged in a contemporary roster of design constraints.

An architect’s role is complicated and there are many constraints to push through to finalize a work of art and something a client is pleased with. An engineer’s role is similar in providing technological proofs which do not block the architect’s voice, but may give strength to or be more significant than the architect’s voice per this same roster of constraints.

Is Frank Lloyd Wright’s Falling Water the perfect building for the perfect location?

Again, we need to continue to think about property in terms of completeness of expression. With Falling Water as an example, we can build the perfect building for the perfect locale, building our impoverished neighborhoods more per a unique identity, rather than more like our more luxurious neighborhoods. We can look closer at who has lived where now and over the past thousands of years. Again, each of our buildings, regardless of where placed, should be reflecting in multiple dimensions, having something shared with the corporate center, the national center, the metropolitan center, and the international center, both informing and being informed by these hubs. And once again, we have an ever complex future to look up to as we live and work today.

Form, culture, and scientific diversity

Today’s technology is rooted in the work of Sir Isaac Newton. Contemporary physics’ paradox in resolving the difference between magnetism and electricity implies multiple truths and we wonder what drove Newton’s work and what drove Einstein’s? Einstein’s theory of relativity works for a bomb or nuclear energy, but it has yet to be proven per Newton. Newton’s calculus, which was developed under patronage, changed with our cultural paradigm as our buildings and music took us from the Renaissance to the Baroque, peaking in Austria with Bach and Roman inspired pluralistic Architecture.

Il Gesu delivers its message from its two dimensional forms and proportions, three dimensional forms and proportions, its shadows, and the juxtaposition of all elements, asking, were the Italians particularly self-conscious of their role in culture, religion, and empire?

Modern physics tells us that all we understand of the atom, the body, the cell might be the product of our culture finding the right frame for the right picture, the clock, the microscope, the voltmeter; these symbols are arbitrary and this is a language. The specific physics of Einstein’s theories, statistically drawn apart from Newton’s mechanics, may have been driven by the necessities of World War II. Newton’s choice of bodies may be driven by forces culturally significant and powerful in his era and geographic region. These bodies may still be present in some or all their form today. We can ask, what is Einstein’s theory specifically, what is Newton’s, with their physics drawn in relation to other physics; what alternate physics could we have developed in our world history and who would have a voice today? Are our physics culturally and technologically restrictive and what can we achieve with scientific diversity?

Following the form of Rem Koolhaas’ CCTV Building, we struggle to identify historical origin and cultural ownership.

Tesla believed our present cultural paradigm, seeing space travel as the future, our organism stemming from the radiation of the sun, limits our options in use of energy, a juxtaposition inducing limitless options from a change of perspective. A similar phenomenon can exist with architectural form; Sullivan wrote that “form ever follows function” which we can interpret as form should stem from the function of its materials, form should reflect its message and its use, and form, as culture, follows function, its use and message. Is the evolution of our form similarly restrictive? Culture as form is perceived individually and collectively, it is used, interpreted, and it works on and for its users and owners. Per Tesla’s difficulties with energy, we can begin thinking about our difficulties with human form and culture. Do we have culturally pluralistic forms, as possibly existed during the Baroque, today? Do we have diversity of form and culture? Do we have the physics to support these cultural paradigms per form follows the function of its materials, the correct laws explaining the correct lighting to match the correct building, the correct culture behind the correct physics to explain the correct ethos of the correct cultural mission for the correct building? Do we have diversity in form, culture, and science?

Finally, we can begin to think about our technology that we buy and use, our refrigerators, microwaves, televisions, and computers, which change our eyes and needs and reflect back to our architecture. Are we preparing ourselves for an exponentially complex future and its benefits to our individual and collective expression and understanding?